Posted by Social Science Research Network
Obfuscation and Shrouding with Network Effects – The Facebook/WhatsApp Case
By Georg Clemens (Compass Lexecon) & Mutlu Özcan (Chair of Applied Microeconomics)
Abstract: This article analyses switching behavior in messaging service markets. WhatsApp’s decision to start forwarding customer data to Facebook outraged its customer base. Our model explains why, despite this outrage, switching to a rival network that does not collect data failed. In a market with network effects, where consumers either perceive excessive data collection as a dis-utility (“sophisticates”) or not (“naives”), an incumbent network refrains from collecting data until all customers joined. When naives join the incumbent’s network they never switch. The entrant network will thus be too small to compete with the incumbent who ultimately remains dominant, as the Facebook/WhatsApp case shows.
Featured News
    FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
    UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
    DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
Antitrust Mix by CPI
    Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Object Identity
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI