Predatory Pricing in Japan – The Battle Between Yamato and Japan Post in the Parcel Delivery Market
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Predatory Pricing in Japan – The Battle Between Yamato and Japan Post in the Parcel Delivery Market Simon Vande Walle (European Union)
Abstract: This article summarizes and comments on Yamato v. Japan Post, one of Japan’s leading cases on predatory pricing. The case clarified the test to assess whether prices are predatory and, hence, unlawful. The case was triggered by the introduction of a new price scheme by Japan Post. Yamato alleged the new prices were predatory and sought injunctive relief before the courts. The Tokyo District Court in 2006 and, on appeal, the Tokyo High Court in 2008 both sided with defendant Japan Post and dismissed the lawsuit.
Featured News
    FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
    UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
    DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
Antitrust Mix by CPI
    Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Object Identity
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI