This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle
Jonathan Zuck, Nov 25, 2009
In a recent speech, Neelie Kroes of the European Commission argued that “as enforcers we do have ” special responsibility to ensure a fair and transparent process. But the great weight of evidence says we meet this responsibility. While the Commission clearly has made some efforts to meet its “special responsibility,” there is also evidence to suggest more can and should be done. The Commission has made important changes to its procedures over the years, but it still has a way to go to create full confidence in its procedural fairness.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
BHP Unveils £31bn Mining Megamerger Proposal with Anglo American
Apr 25, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
ByteDance Prefers Shutdown Over Sale of TikTok Amid US Ban Threats
Apr 25, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Votes to Restore Net Neutrality Rules
Apr 25, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Apple Rejects Spotify’s Updated App Over In-App Pricing Disclosure
Apr 25, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Set to Reinstate Net Neutrality Rules Today
Apr 25, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI