The US Supreme Court rejected computer scientist Stephen Thaler’s challenge to the US Patent and Trademark Office’s decision not to grant patents for inventions developed by his artificial intelligence system.
Thaler’s appeal of a lower court’s decision was denied by the justices, stating that patents are only granted to human inventors. The AI system in question could not be recognized as the legal creator of two inventions that Thaler claimed it had generated.
Thaler established Imagination Engines Inc, a technology company specializing in artificial neural networks located in Saint Charles, Missouri. Thaler claims that his DABUS system, which stands for Device for the Autonomous Bootstrapping of Unified Sentience, generated distinct prototypes for a beverage holder and emergency light beacon independently.
Read more: SCOTUS Asked To Rule On Whether AI Can Be A Patent Inventor
The US Patent and Trademark Office, along with a federal judge in Virginia, denied his patent applications for inventions due to the argument that DABUS is not a person. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, focused on patents, upheld these decisions in the previous year and stated that according to US patent law, inventors must be human beings.
Thaler presented to the Supreme Court the argument that AI is being utilized to advance innovation in various areas including medicine and energy. He stated that declining patents generated by AI obstructs the patent system’s capacity and goes against Congress’s objective to efficiently encourage technological progress and innovation.
Supporters of Thaler in his Supreme Court case include Lawrence Lessig, a Harvard Law professor, and other academics who argue in a brief that the decision made by the Federal Circuit could potentially harm current and future investments, impact US competitiveness, and is not in line the language used in the Patent Act.
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI