The CNMC has said that the agreement between the Anesco stevedoring companies and the stevedores’ unions “includes a series of obligations […] that go beyond the scope of collective bargaining …”, considering that such obligations could “suppose a restriction on right of separation and free competition “.
It was also argued that the recently approved regulation to reform this sector “gives back to the social agents the possibility of agreeing compulsory subrogations by stowage companies… firms that had a monopoly over the sector and that were extinguished with its reform. ”
In response, the employers of Anesco considered that the agreement is a purely labor issue, which has legal coverage and that “is not subject to European competition legislation.”, Lamenting also the uncertainty that was created with such decision, because “it harms competitiveness and legal security of the activity” in this sector, dedicated to the loading and unloading of merchandise from shipping vessels.
Full Content: La Información
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI