Spanish energy company Gas Natural Fenosa has filed an appeal against the contest held by the Madrid City Council to allocate their energy supply contracts for 2018, which award points to firms using renewable sources. Fenosa considers that their criteria for evaluation “Is not equal for all companies that opt for this contest,” because it favors companies selling zero-emission energy.
The contract bid requires that all the energy supplied by the winning company be guaranteed to be of renewable origin, and grants an extra valuation of up to five points (out of a total of 100) to the participants according to their energy rating issued annually by the markets and competition regulator, the CNMC.
The resource considers it “appropriate” to demand that the energy consumed be 100% renewable, but its complaint lies in the rewarding of suppliers that generate less carbon dioxide, since ” this has as a single and obvious objective: to favor small trading companies to the detriment of the rest of the trading companies that have been in this sector for the longest time.”
Full story: El País
Want more news? Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up to date with the latest developments in antitrust.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI