Team Bidding by Private Equity Sponsors: Are the Antitrust Allegations Plausible?
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Team Bidding by Private Equity Sponsors: Are the Antitrust Allegations Plausible? Robert Comment (Independent)
Abstract: The dozen largest private equity firms are accused of bid-rigging in the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market due to the practice of team bidding in groups known as clubs or consortia. The antitrust allegations are implausible, however, because the segments of the M&A market dominated by private equity firms are among the most competitive of all, sale processes are run by disinterested directors who’s permission generally is required before prospective buyers can team up, and the differential average offer premium paid by teams of private equity sponsors is zero.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI