Posted by Social Science Research Network
The Antitrust F Word: Fairness Considerations in Competition Law
By Sandra Marco Colino
This paper explores value of fairness as a goal of competition law. It contrasts the developments in the US, where non-economic goals are largely discarded by the prevailing antitrust thinking, with those in the EU and China, where the pursuit of fair competition has been explicitly acknowledged and attempted according to different strategies, with mixed results. The main argument put forward is that a fairness-deprived antitrust policy which focuses solely on narrow interpretations of the concept of economic efficiency tends to perish, and is not sufficient to control the nefarious consequences of unrestrained market power. At the same time, there is a risk of unpredictability attached to fairness considerations which must be addressed to ensure legal certainty and to avoid the misuse of antitrust, an intricate yet very valuable piece of the legal system which, if used to its full potential, could serve to allow efficient firms to flourish protected from the risks inherent to unfair distortions of competition.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI