The Global Antitrust Attack On Intellectual Property Rights And What The US Should Do About It
Posted by Forbes
The Global Antitrust Attack On Intellectual Property Rights And What The US Should Do About It
By Koren Wong-Ervin
There is a disturbing trend among international antitrust authorities: using antitrust laws to devalue intellectual property rights, to intervene in favor of one side or another in licensing disputes, and to impose unwarranted extra-jurisdictional remedies on patent licensing (i.e., foreign governments telling US companies how to price US and other foreign patents). This trend is a serious problem for innovation, economic growth, and consumers.
For example, several countries, including China, India, Korea, and even some government officials in the United States, have proposed or imposed antitrust rules that would diminish the value of patents essential to interoperability standards such as the 3G and 4G standards critical to innovation in wireless markets.
The new antitrust rules seek to regulate price by, among other things, creating an antitrust sanction (with the threat of treble damages or other high fines) for charging a royalty based on a percentage of the end-user device (such as a mobile phone) as opposed to on the smallest component part (such as a chipset). Such rules ignore the economic evidence finding that the existing industry practice of end-user device licensing tends to result in lower overall prices for consumers and to spur innovation. They also overlook that wireless cellular technologies often read on the system or device level, rather than the component level. These rules interfere with private arms-length negotiations in patent licensing and ignore the number of considerations that may dictate the parties’ selection of a royalty base. Industry practice and the reduction of transaction and administrative costs (easy monitoring or verification of the number of units sold) are a few such considerations.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI