Vivien Rose, Apr 01, 2010
To date, the literature on the role of behavioral economics in the context of competition policy has largely focused on the development of the theory and practice of behavioral economics in the analysis of competition cases. It is also useful, however, to consider how arguments about behavioral economics are likely to be received in a judicial setting.
It will take longer for academic writings on behavioral economics to filter through into the arguments before and judgments of the Tribunal or the High Court than it does in the U.S. courts—indeed that might never happen. But, in fact, what courts have been doing all along may be closer to behavioral economics than to more conventional economic theories of rational behavior.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
    Senator Warner Calls for Treasury Oversight on Big Tech Sanctions
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Canada’s Industry Minister Targets Grocery Giants with Antitrust Changes
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    DOT Issues Provisional Ruling Ending Delta-Aeroméxico Partnership
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    US Targets China with Proposed Rules on Cloud Giants in AI Development
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Australia’s ACCC Finds Limited Evidence of Profiteering in Childcare Sector Despite Soaring Fees
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
Antitrust Mix by CPI
    Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Object Identity
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI