This article is part of a Journal. See more from this Journal

Tying and Consumer Harm

Daniel Crane, Dec 20, 2012

Brantley raises important issues of law, economics, and policy about tying arrangements. Under current legal principles, Brantley was on solid ground in distinguishing between anticompetitive ties and those that might harm consumer interests without impairing competition. As a mat- ter of economics, the court was also right to reject the claim that the cable programmers forced consumers to pay for programs the customers didn't want. The hardest question is a policy one- whether antitrust law should ever condemn the exploitation of market power in ways that extract surplus from consumers but do not create or enlarge market power. I shall argue that Brantley got this last question right as well.

Links to Full Content

Comments

You can't post comments until you have logged in. Please login here or register.

Comments

  • Yes I completely agree with this blog, the consumers are not getting that much benefit comparatively the amount that they are paying.

    [url=http://www.zippd.com.au]onesies[/url]

    Posted by vern Malloy, 16/02/2013 1:12am (1 year ago)

  • Yes I completely agree with this blog, the consumers are not getting that much benefit comparatively the amount that they are paying.

    <a href="http://www.zippd.com.au">a onesie</a>

    Posted by vern Malloy, 16/02/2013 1:11am (1 year ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments