By Paul Gift, Forbes
“Forthcoming”
With one word, the antitrust lawsuit filed against the UFC by now-former fighters snapped back into reality after an eight-month hiatus as Judge Richard Boulware of the U.S. District Court in Las Vegas closes in on a decision on whether the case should be certified as a class action.
Boulware’s tease of a forthcoming decision came as he issued a ruling on a few miscellaneous motions, granting motions to seal and declining to reinstate a portion of the previously stricken testimony of former UFC matchmaker Joe Silva.
While it might be tempting to think the UFC’s back is against the proverbial cage as the world’s largest MMA promoter with fighter compensation calculated at 19.5% of event revenues, antitrust cases are not easy to win. You don’t go into court and say the UFC is big, it pays its fighters a lower share of event revenues than similar metrics in the Big Four sports, therefore it’s guilty of “being a monopoly.” That’s not how antitrust cases work.
Featured News
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Japanese Regulator Approves Korean Air’s Merger with Asiana Airlines
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Netgear Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Huawei Alleging Patent Misuse
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Tennessee and Virginia Attorneys General Challenge NCAA’s NIL Rules in Federal Lawsuit
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI