The UK’s Court of Appeal ruled Wednesday, July 4, that a fight between UK retailers and credit card companies over fees has to be reexamined by a competition tribunal.
The Financial Times, citing court proceedings, reported that Asda, J Sainsbury and Wm Morrison’s claims against Visa and Mastercard will be decided by three senior judges. The retailers are appealing three separate cases that the judges would rule on, noted the report. The legal fight has to do with interchange fees, which are the costs businesses pay for processing credit card payments. The fee is charged every time a credit card is used by the consumer. The retailers contend the amount of interchange fees at Mastercard and Visa run afoul of the restriction of competition law. The outcome could impact other lawsuits Mastercard and Visa are facing over interchange fees, noted the Financial Times. The Court of Appeal said it was planning to send the three cases back to the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) for reconsideration.
The CAT can neither retry the cases nor hear new evidence, but it can assess damages and decide if exemptions should be applied to the credit card companies. The High Court judge will chair the review, reported the Financial Times. The three cases were sent to the Court of Appeals after differing rulings by judges in lower courts, noted the report. In 2016 the Competition Appeal Tribunal ordered Mastercard to pay £68.5m in damages to Sainsbury. The tribunal ruled Mastercard broke European Union and UK competition laws regarding interchange fees. Sainsbury has also claimed damages because of the level of interchange fees. Visa, on the flip side, won a case against Sainsbury with the High Court finding the U.K. fees did not break the competition laws.
In a statement to the Financial Times, Mastercard said, “We continue to firmly believe that retailers derive real value from our network and we are committed to helping our retail partners grow their businesses and encourage the adoption of ever more convenient, safe and secure payments.” Visa declined to comment in the report. Meanwhile, J Sainsbury said in a statement: “We are pleased with the Court of Appeal’s declaration that both Mastercard and Visa’s domestic interchange fees are restrictive of competition. We will consider the judgment carefully and remain confident in the next hearing at the Competition Appeal Tribunal which will examine whether there is any lawful level of interchange fee for either scheme and establish our damages.”
Full Content: PYMNTS
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
T-Mobile’s Acquisition of Ka’ena Corporation Receives FCC Approval
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
UK Regulator Announces Two New Senior Executive Appointments
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
Paramount Global and Skydance Media Near Merger Deal, Eyeing CEO Change
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
BHP Unveils £31bn Mining Megamerger Proposal with Anglo American
Apr 25, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
ByteDance Prefers Shutdown Over Sale of TikTok Amid US Ban Threats
Apr 25, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI