A PYMNTS Company

US: Apple presses Supreme Court to hear Ebooks antitrust appeal

 |  January 24, 2016

Firing back at the Department of Justice, Apple says its decision to enter the ebook market had “tremendous procompetitive effects,” resulting in benefits like an increase in digital book sales.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The company makes that argument in new court papers, filed as part of a bid to appeal its antitrust defeat to the US Supreme Court. Late last month, the Justice Department urged the Supreme Court to reject the case on the grounds that the verdict against Apple was “supported by overwhelming evidence.”

    The legal battle between Apple and the Justice Department dates to 2012, when federal and state prosecutors accused Apple and five publishers — Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin and Simon & Schuster — with conspiring to end Amazon’s policy of charging $9.99 for electronic versions of new releases and bestsellers.

    Full content: Lawyer Herald

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.