Microsoft has filed a lawsuit against South Korea’s Samsung Electronics, a move that is heating up a disagreement between the two over patent royalty payments.
According to reports, Microsoft and Samsung signed a contract in which Samsung agreed to pay patent royalties to Microsoft. But after Microsoft’s decision to acquire Nokia’s handset operations, Samsung has refused to pay those royalties.
Samsung reportedly argues that the 2011 agreement to pay royalties on Microsoft patents does not apply to products sold by Microsoft after its acquisition of Nokia. Microsoft agrees, and has now filed a lawsuit against Samsung, which Microsoft says eventually paid the disputed royalties but has refused to pay interest.
According to reports, Microsoft first began seeking royalty payments from handset makers to ramp up its ability to compete in the smartphone market. Samsung, LG and HTC have all signed agreements to do so. Motorola, however, has refused to sign the agreement; the companies have been involved in a separate legal battle since 2010 over the dispute.
Microsoft is seeking monetary recover from Samsung but the company has not publicized exactly how much it is seeking.
Samsung has previously expressed disapproval of Microsoft’ acquisition of Nokia, arguing that Nokia is now demanding higher patent likening fees from the company following Microsoft’s acquisition. Nokia was feared to become a patent troll after Microsoft acquires its handset operations, leaving Nokia to evolve into a company that depends on its intellectual property for profits.
Full content: Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC to Approve Exxon’s $64 Billion Deal with Pioneer Resources, Excludes
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
UK Competition Watchdog Raises Alarm Over Nvidia’s ARM Takeover
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Sen. Klobuchar Urges Regulators to Probe Collusion in Health Care Pricing
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Multiple States Join Tennessee’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against NCAA Over NIL Rules
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
NY AG Joins Suit Challenging NCAA’s Restrictions on Student Athlete NIL Rights
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI