The NCAA will face a Hawaii antitrust suit over its decertification of the 2003 Seattle Bowl, the Hawaii Supreme Court decided.
Aloha Sports showed the NCAA’s allegedly anticompetitive behavior could negatively affect the Bowl market and it was harmed by that behavior, the November 20 opinion by Justice Richard Pollack stated.
Aloha Sports sponsored the Oahu Bowl in Hawaii, but in 2001 the game was moved to Seattle.
After the NCAA had concerns about the way Aloha Sports operated the 2002 Seattle Bowl, Aloha Sports tried to sell its sponsorship rights to Pro Sports and Entertainment. The sale was contingent on the game being recertified.
The NCAA refused to recertify the game, but told Pro Sports privately it could submit its own application to sponsor the 2004 Seattle Bowl. Pro Sports backed out of its deal with Aloha Sports.
The NCAA’s conduct was an unfair method of competition in violation of Hawaii’s antitrust law, Aloha Sports claimed.
Aloha Sports showed the NCAA knew about the impending sale, expressed concerns about Aloha Sports’s owner staying involved in the bowl game after the sale was completed, and told Pro Sports independently it could seek its own certification, the court stated.
That could suggest the NCAA unfairly decertified the 2003 Seattle Bowl to disrupt Aloha Sports’s sale to Pro Sports, the court stated. It also created an issue whether the NCAA’s conduct negatively affected competition among bowl sponsors, it stated.
Featured News
T-Mobile’s Acquisition of Ka’ena Corporation Receives FCC Approval
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
UK Regulator Announces Two New Senior Executive Appointments
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
Paramount Global and Skydance Media Near Merger Deal, Eyeing CEO Change
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
BHP Unveils £31bn Mining Megamerger Proposal with Anglo American
Apr 25, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
ByteDance Prefers Shutdown Over Sale of TikTok Amid US Ban Threats
Apr 25, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI