James Cooper, Luke Froeb, Daniel O’Brien, Michael Vita, Sep 01, 2005
Until theory can be used to determine how likely it is that a restraint will lead to an anticompetitive outcome, decision makers will be left with a considerable amount of uncertainty. In this world, enforcement decisions should be guided by prior beliefs and loss functions. The authors review of the existing empirical evidence which informs their priors suggests that vertical restraints are likely to be benign or welfare-enhancing.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
    Senator Warner Calls for Treasury Oversight on Big Tech Sanctions
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Canada’s Industry Minister Targets Grocery Giants with Antitrust Changes
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    DOT Issues Provisional Ruling Ending Delta-Aeroméxico Partnership
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    US Targets China with Proposed Rules on Cloud Giants in AI Development
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Australia’s ACCC Finds Limited Evidence of Profiteering in Childcare Sector Despite Soaring Fees
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
Antitrust Mix by CPI
    Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Object Identity
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI