What Would Adam Smith Have Thought About Modern Cartel Policy, 300 Years After His Birth?
By: Bruce Lyons (Center for Competition Policy, UEA)
The commemoration of the Tercentenary of Adam Smith’s birth prompted a revisit to one of the most renowned quotes in competition policy, seeking a deeper understanding of its context and the true intentions behind it. The question arose as to whether Smith would have sanctioned modern cartel policies or perceived them as undue interference in the natural workings of the market.
Smith emerged as a fervent proponent of competition, with a deep-seated concern about its potential erosion. He held the view that collusion was ingrained within industries, asserting, “People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.” [1] This profound skepticism regarding business motives has since become a cornerstone of effective enforcement of competition laws. Smith further espoused the belief that “Consumption is the sole end and purpose of all production, and the interest of the producer ought to be attended to only so far as it may be necessary for promoting that of the consumer.” [2] This aligns closely with the contemporary concept of consumer welfare, as Smith’s concern about collusion lay in its adverse impact on consumers, often resulting in increased profits at their expense. However, Smith did not go so far as to propose the outright illegality of cartels.
Another pivotal aspect of Smith’s normative analysis rests on his unwavering belief in personal liberty. He advocated for an economic system wherein every individual “is left perfectly free to pursue his own interest in his own way, and to bring both his industry and his capital into competition with those of any other man.” [3] While this sentiment may bear resemblance to present-day concerns over “exclusionary effects,” the latter predominantly revolve around future price hikes. Smith, on the other hand, perceived inherent value in the individual’s freedom to enter the market, irrespective of the implications for consumer prices and product quality…
Featured News
T-Mobile’s Acquisition of Ka’ena Corporation Receives FCC Approval
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
UK Regulator Announces Two New Senior Executive Appointments
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
Paramount Global and Skydance Media Near Merger Deal, Eyeing CEO Change
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
BHP Unveils £31bn Mining Megamerger Proposal with Anglo American
Apr 25, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
ByteDance Prefers Shutdown Over Sale of TikTok Amid US Ban Threats
Apr 25, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI