Integrating Regulatory and Antitrust Powers: Does It Work? Case Studies from Spain and Mexico
Elisa Mariscal, Sep 11, 2014
There are a wide variety of possible structures for regulatory regimes in countries. This article focuses on the analysis of multi-purpose regulators that combine regulatory and antitrust powers, such as the Mexican IFT and Cofece, as well as the Spanish CNMC. We focus on institutional design, review the existing literature on the pros and cons of single-purpose vs. multi-purpose regulators, and use the new Spanish and the Mexican institutional settings to contrast how such pros and cons are designed to operate on paper and how they do so in real life. Our goal is to look for evidence, at the very initial stage of the reforms in both these countries, of whether these countries are moving closer to a rule of law equilibrium.
Featured News
    FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
    UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
    DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
    Jan 31, 2024 by
        CPI    
Antitrust Mix by CPI
    Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Object Identity
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI